From: sbharris@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) Newsgroups: sci.med,misc.health.alternative,sci.med.pharmacy Subject: Re: Nicotine Date: 28 Apr 1998 04:37:59 GMT In <6i2u72$j5s@basement.replay.com> nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) writes: >I wonder why someone doesn't market a device for inhaling pure nicotine. >If they can make nicotine gum I don't see why they couldn't do this. Or >are there people out there who just don't want other people to be able >to enjoy themselves without paying what they feel is the price for it? The tobacco industry spent a VERY large sum of money developing just such a smokeless cigarette, which was basically what you discribe-- a little set of cigarette sized mini-inhalers meant to be tossed when used up. A boon to long duration commercial jet fliers and people needing to be in smoke free areas. They got it to work, and work well, or so the report I read said. But the project fell through for internal and external reasons. Internal was that the tobacco industry was not at that time willing to admit that cigarettes are more or less a nicotene delivery tool. External was that the FDA was making regulatory noises in the direction of the tobacco industry over the units, and nobody wanted them to have a ledge to stand on, or way to get a foot in the door, or whatever the metaphor you like best is. And finally, there were a bunch of people on both sides of the smoking "fence" who opposed the things for the same reason a lot of people once opposed birth control pills. They just didn't like the idea of human beings getting that much control over nature when it came to a rather intimate act. There are some people for whom smoking is like sex: disect it, and it loses something. Laugh if you will, but you see herbalists of this type all over alternative newsgroups, actually. Mysticism for them is an essential part of life, and the core of mysticism is *mystery*: not knowing every fine detail about what you are doing. You see these people regularly throwing hissy fits when they find out that the tobacco industry grows plants deliberately with more or less nicotene in them, or uses more or less ammonia in cigarettes to freebase more or less nicotene into the smoke. They just hate that, but can't quite tell you why. Fear not, though. Look at the history of nearly every good idea, and you'll find that several instances in which it was proposed ahead of its time, and died. Smokeless cigarettes will be back one day. The world just wasn't ready for them in 1990 (or whenever). Steve Harris, M.D. |