From: "Steve Harris" <sbharris123@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: sci.med,sci.med.diseases.cancer Subject: Low Cholesterol-- Honest to God Colon CA Risk? Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 21:28:35 -0600 The majority of studies have found that almost all of the effect of low cholesterol on cancer mortality shows up in the first few years, while the effect of high cholesterol on heart disease is persistent. This suggests that causation is cancer-->low cholesterol, rather than the reverse. Only two studies have found a major persistent association of cancer and low cholesterol at durations of 10 years, suggesting that the causal nature runs the other way, or is due to an undiscovered confounder (a third factor which causes both low cholesterol and cancer): Am J Epidemiol 2000 Apr 15;151(8):739-47 Comment in: Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr 15;151(8):748-51 Which cholesterol level is related to the lowest mortality in a population with low mean cholesterol level: a 6.4-year follow-up study of 482,472 Korean men. Song YM, Sung J, Kim JS. Department of Family Medicine, SungKyunKwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. ymsong@smc.samsung.co.kr To evaluate the relation between low cholesterol level and mortality, the authors followed 482,472 Korean men aged 30-65 years from 1990 to 1996 after a baseline health examination. The mean cholesterol level of the men was 189.1 mg/100 ml at the baseline measurement. There were 7,894 deaths during the follow-up period. A low cholesterol level (<165 mg/100 ml) was associated with increased risk of total mortality, even after eliminating deaths that occurred in the first 5 years of follow-up. The risk of death from coronary heart disease increased significantly in men with the highest cholesterol level (> or =252 mg/100 ml). There were various relations between cholesterol level and cancer mortality by site. Mortality from liver and colon cancer was significantly associated with a very low cholesterol level (<135 mg/100 ml) without any evidence of a preclinical cholesterol-lowering effect. With lengthening follow-up, the significant relation between a very low cholesterol level (<135 mg/100 ml) and mortality from stomach and esophageal cancer disappeared. The cholesterol level related with the lowest mortality ranged from 211 to 251 mg/100 ml, which was higher than the mean cholesterol level of study subjects. PMID: 10965970 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Cancer 1992 Sep 1;70(5):1038-43 Serum cholesterol level, body mass index, and the risk of colon cancer. The Framingham Study. Kreger BE, Anderson KM, Schatzkin A, Splansky GL. Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Massachusetts. BACKGROUND. Some studies have linked low serum cholesterol levels to increased risk of colon cancer, particularly in men. Results have been inconsistent, with preclinical disease frequently offered to explain any apparent association. METHODS. The Framingham Study cohort of 5209 persons, initially 30-62 years of age and observed more than 30 years, was evaluated. Baseline data included lipoprotein fractions, total cholesterol levels, body mass index, alcohol intake, and cardiovascular risk variables such as cigarette smoking, hypertension, and glucose intolerance. RESULTS. In this population, colon cancer in men is related inversely to serum cholesterol levels, even when the first 10 years of follow-up are eliminated to reduce the effect of preclinical disease. This effect is concentrated in the Svedberg 0-20 fraction, corresponding to low-density lipoprotein levels. Another finding only in men is the direct relation of body mass index to colon cancer incidence. CONCLUSIONS. Combined initial low serum cholesterol levels and obesity appear to indicate a four times greater risk for colon cancer in men as compared with people with average values of both variables. The reasons for these observations are unknown. PMID: 1515981 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] COMMENT: That's it. The Korean study is weird because it's, well, Korean. Nobody else sees anything quite like it. They didn't control for smoking, and this may explain the large number of cancers they see associated with low cholesterol. Their only persistent one that is not seen in other studies is liver cancer. Which makes one wish to know if chronic hepatitis B is the confounder. Such a persistent long duration association between low cholesterol and colon cancer only, is seen in other two other studies: The Framingham results are shown above. They must be pulled out of rather special group of obese men with unexpectedly low cholesterol who will get colon cancer. The other is the Japanese-American Hawaii study below, in which the long duration association held only for bowel cancer, and indeed only for men with cecal bowel cancer (the very people who need colonosopy the worst!) In this group alone there may be something causal going on (it might be a good idea for overweight men with really great cholesterols to have colonoscopy once a year for life). In the rest of the 7 studies below, most direct causality in the direction cholesterol--> cancer appears to be ruled out by the fact that the effect fades rapidly over time (unlike the heart disease connection!). That means there is evidence from them against the notion that lowering your cholesterol will increase your cancer risk. If you are an obese male, it's possible that lowering your cholesterol will increase your cecal cancer risk, though none of the statin trials (which have looked at cancer risk) have found such an effect. However, it is worth noting that there are a number of other cholesterol lowering studies by many other mechanisms than statins, which have found modest evidence of an increased bowel cancer risk. This was even true for the Wadsworth VA study, in which men lowered heart disease risk by drinking corn oil, but increased their bowel cancer risk to the point that mortality was a wash (total mortality in the statin trials was helped by the drug, so we know that answer). Bottom line: yes, LDL is a causal agent for heart disease. The only cancer for which there is very good evidence that low LDL might be causal, is proximal colon cancer (in men). Men: take your statins and get that colonoscopy. Especially get it if your cholesterol is down for any OTHER reason (including diet and your "good genes") than statin use. Finally, to be fair, it appears that from the literature that an intervention trial to RAISE LDLs in low cholesterol men who are at special risk for colon cancer, and have been carefully screened for heart disease, may be is warrented. Nobody's had the guts to suggest this. Yet. BMJ 1995 Aug 12;311(7002):409-13 Comment in: BMJ. 1995 Nov 25;311(7017):1438 Low serum total cholesterol concentrations and mortality in middle aged British men. Wannamethee G, Shaper AG, Whincup PH, Walker M. Department of Public Health, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London. OBJECTIVE--To examine the relation between low serum total cholesterol concentrations and causes of mortality. DESIGN--Cohort study of men followed up for an average of 14.8 years (range 13.5-16.0 years). SETTING--One general practice in each of 24 British towns. SUBJECTS--7735 men aged 40-59 at screening selected at random from the 24 general practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Deaths from all causes, cardiovascular causes, cancer, and non-cardiovascular, non-cancer causes. RESULTS--During the mean follow up period of 14.8 years there were 1257 deaths from all causes, 640 cardiovascular deaths, 433 cancer deaths, and 184 deaths from other causes. Low serum cholesterol concentrations (< 4.8 mmol/l), present in 5% (n = 410) of the men, were associated with the highest mortality from all causes, largely due to a significant increase in cancer deaths (age adjusted relative risk 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.3); < 4.8 v 4.8-5.9 mmol/l) and in other non-cardiovascular deaths (age adjusted relative risk 1.9 (1.1 to 3.1)). Low serum cholesterol concentration was associated with an increased prevalence of several diseases and indicators of ill health and with lifestyle characteristics such as smoking and heavy drinking. After adjustment for these factors in the multivariate analysis the increased risk for cancer was attenuated (relative risk 1.4 (0.9 to 2.0) and the inverse association with other non-cardiovascular, non-cancer causes was no longer significant (relative risk 1.5 (0.9 to 2.6); < 4.8 v 4.8-5.9 mmol/l). The excess risks of cancer and of other non-cardiovascular deaths were most pronounced in the first five years and became attenuated and non-significant with longer follow up. By contrast, the positive association between serum total cholesterol concentration and cardiovascular mortality was seen even after more than 10 years of follow up. CONCLUSION--The association between comparatively low serum total cholesterol concentrations and excess mortality seemed to be due to preclinical cancer and other non-cardiovascular diseases. This suggests that public health programmes encouraging lower average concentrations of serum total cholesterol are unlikely to be associated with increased cancer or other non-cardiovascular mortality. PMID: 7640584 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Int J Epidemiol 1992 Feb;21(1):16-22 Cholesterol and cancer in a population of male civil service workers. Baptiste MS, Nasca PC, Doyle JT, Rothenberg RR, MacCubbin PA, Mettlin C, Metzger BB, Carlton KA. New York State Department of Health, Albany 12237-0683. Cancer incidence and mortality were ascertained in a cohort of 1910 male participants of the Albany Cardiovascular Health Center (CVHC). The New York State Cancer Registry, vital records files, CVHC follow-up records, New York State Retirement System files, and New York State Department of Motor Vehicles driver's license files were used. Serum cholesterol measurements as well as values for other exposure variables were obtained from records of medical examinations which began in 1953-1954. The study cohort was divided into two groups, based on initial serum cholesterol measurement (less than or equal to 190 mg/100 ml and less than or equal to 190 mg/100 ml). For total cancers, both incidence and mortality were similar in these groups. For digestive cancer, both incidence and mortality were slightly lower in the less than or equal to 190 mg/100 ml group. The deficit was not statistically significant. For respiratory cancer, relative risk and rate ratio estimates were in the range of 1.4-1.7 for incidence and mortality. The excess risk in the less than or equal to 190 mg/100 ml group was of borderline statistical significance. The association was concentrated in the lowest cholesterol quintile rather than suggesting a strong dose-response relationship. The estimates were not found to be confounded by cigarette smoking, body mass index, education or age. A reduction in the crude rate ratio estimate from 1.5 to 1.2 was observed when early cases were excluded, suggesting that part of the observed excess may be due to preclinical cancer. PMID: 1544748 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] J Natl Cancer Inst 1991 Oct 2;83(19):1403-7 Prospective study of serum cholesterol levels and large-bowel cancer. Nomura AM, Stemmermann GN, Chyou PH. Japan-Hawaii Cancer Study, Kuakini Medical Center, Honolulu. Based on previous reports, it is uncertain whether serum cholesterol levels are inversely related to colon cancer risk. In this study, serum cholesterol levels were measured in 7926 Japanese-American men who were followed for over 20 years. Two hundred thirty-one incident cases of colon cancer and 97 cases of rectal cancer were identified. An increase in serum cholesterol levels was associated with a decrease in risk for colon cancer (P value for trend = .01) but not for rectal cancer. This association appeared stronger as the site of cancer moved from the sigmoid colon to the cecum. The data were further analyzed by interval from examination to diagnosis. The inverse association was present for colon cancer cases diagnosed within 10 years of examination (P value for trend less than .01), especially for cecum-ascending colon cancer cases (P less than ..01). A similar inverse pattern was found for cecum-ascending colon cancer cases diagnosed after 10 years, but the association was not statistically significant. The results suggest that the preclinical effects of undiagnosed colon cancer contributed to the inverse association, but these effects do not entirely explain why the relationship with hypocholesterolemia was stronger in men who were subsequently diagnosed with right-sided colon cancer. PMID: 1920483 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Nutr Cancer 1991;15(3-4):205-15 Associations between breast cancer, plasma triglycerides, and cholesterol. Potischman N, McCulloch CE, Byers T, Houghton L, Nemoto T, Graham S, Campbell TC. Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. A case-control study investigating the association between plasma lipids and breast cancer was conducted among women aged 30-80 in Buffalo, NY. All eligible women from a large breast clinic and two area physicians' offices were requested to participate over a one-year period. Subjects completed a health questionnaire and donated a fasting blood sample prior to diagnostic breast biopsies. The 83 women found to have breast cancer (cases) had significantly higher plasma triglyceride values than did the 113 women found not to have breast cancer (controls). Lower plasma beta-carotene values were associated with breast cancer, but only in those women with elevated triglyceride or cholesterol. Plasma cholesterol values were lower in those breast cancer cases presenting with more advanced stages of cancer, suggesting that metabolic effects of clinical and preclinical breast cancer may lower cholesterol levels. Although the limitations of case-control studies are well-recognized, these data suggest an etiologic role for plasma triglycerides and beta-carotene or for related dietary factors. PMID: 1866314 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Int J Epidemiol 1990 Jun;19(2):274-8 Serum lipids and colorectal adenoma among male self-defence officials in northern Kyushu, Japan. Kono S, Ikeda N, Yanai F, Yamamoto M, Shigematsu T. Department of Public Health, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Japan. Colorectal adenoma is regarded as a precursor lesion of adenocarcinoma. In view of the controversy on serum cholesterol and colorectal cancer, the risk of colorectal adenoma was examined in relation to serum total cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol. In the comparison of 88 men having adenoma and 1055 men with normal colonoscopy, there was no association between serum total cholesterol and colorectal adenoma. An increased risk of adenoma was observed at the highest quartile of triglycerides and at the lowest of HDL-cholesterol. When the three serum lipids were simultaneously examined, only the relation with HDL-cholesterol remained unchanged giving odds ratio of 1.7 at the lowest quartile compared with the upper three combined (p less than 0.05). The present study is consistent with the view that the inverse relation between serum total cholesterol and colorectal cancer is due to the effects of preclinical cancer. Further clarification is needed on low HDL-cholesterol and colorectal adenoma. PMID: 2376436 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] J Natl Cancer Inst 1989 Dec 20;81(24):1917-21 Cancer incidence and cancer mortality in relation to serum cholesterol. Tornberg SA, Holm LE, Carstensen JM, Eklund GA. Department of General Oncology, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. We studied cancer incidence and mortality from cancer and coronary heart disease in relation to serum cholesterol levels in 92,710 individuals followed-up in the nationwide Swedish Cancer Register and the Swedish Cause of Death Register for 18-20 years. According to Cox's proportional hazard model, total cancer incidence and total cancer mortality were negatively correlated to serum cholesterol level (P less than .001). The negative correlations were most pronounced during the first years of follow-up. Cancer mortality data showed a stronger negative association to cholesterol than did incidence data during the first 10 years of follow-up (P less than .05). Mortality from coronary heart disease was positively correlated to serum cholesterol (P less than .001) during the entire follow-up. In contrast to most studies that were based on mortality data, our results of the comparison of incidence and mortality data of the same cohort are in agreement with those of a cholesterol-lowering effect of a preclinical cancer. Efforts by investigators and clinicians to lower serum cholesterol to prevent cardiovascular disease are, according to the present findings, not likely to increase cancer mortality risks but would extend life, irrespective of cause of death. PMID: 2593170 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41(6):519-30 Serum cholesterol and risk of cancer in a cohort of 39,000 men and women. Knekt P, Reunanen A, Aromaa A, Heliovaara M, Hakulinen T, Hakama M. Social Insurance Institution, Helsinki, Finland. Serum cholesterol concentration was studied for its prediction of cancer in 39,268 men and women aged 15-99 years and initially free from cancer. During a median follow-up of 10 years 1381 cancer cases were diagnosed. Serum cholesterol level was inversely associated with cancer incidence among non-smokers. Age-adjusted relative risks of cancer in quintiles of serum cholesterol were in male non-smokers 1.0, 0.81, 0.73, 0.69, and 0.46 and in female non-smokers 1.0, 0.75, 0.84, 0.78, and 0.70. The associations were not found to be confounded by serum vitamins A or E, serum selenium or several other factors. The association between serum cholesterol level and risk of cancer varied from strongly negative to slightly positive according to subpopulation and site of cancer. The strongest negative associations were found to appear during the first years of follow-up, especially for rapidly developing cancers. Thus the increased occurrence of cancer at low cholesterol levels seems mainly to be due to preclinical cancer. Publication Types: Review Review, tutorial PMID: 3290396 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] JAMA 1987 Feb 20;257(7):943-8 Serum cholesterol levels and cancer mortality in 361,662 men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Sherwin RW, Wentworth DN, Cutler JA, Hulley SB, Kuller LH, Stamler J. Several prospective studies have demonstrated an association between low serum cholesterol level and subsequent mortality from cancer. This finding was explored in the large cohort (361,662) of men aged 35 to 57 years who were screened for possible randomization to the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Mortality follow-up revealed a significant excess of cancer in the lowest decile of serum cholesterol level during the early years of follow-up, which attenuated over time. In contrast, the association between high serum cholesterol and coronary heart disease did not diminish during the average of seven years of follow-up. These findings are consistent with the inference that the association between low serum cholesterol level and cancer is at least in part due to an effect of preclinical cancer on serum cholesterol level. A subset of the cohort (12,866 men) participated in the randomized Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial protocol, which called for annual measurements of serum cholesterol level. Among the 150 of these men who died of cancer during the trial, cholesterol level fell 22.7 mg/dL (0.59 mmol/L) more than in the survivors over an equivalent period. These data are consistent with the foregoing inference. Publication Types: Clinical trial Randomized controlled trial PMID: 3806876 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] J Chronic Dis 1986;39(11):861-70 Serum cholesterol and the incidence of cancer in a large cohort. Hiatt RA, Fireman BH. The relation of serum cholesterol to the development of cancer remains unclear. We have examined the incidence of cancer in 160,135 men and women who were health plan members of the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program (KPMCP) and who had a multiphasic health examination in the period 1964 through 1972. In addition to all cancer, we examined individually the nine most common cancers in men and the 12 most common in women. Cancer diagnoses (N = 7477) recorded by the State of California Resource for Cancer Epidemiology Section and the health plan hospital discharge file were used to calculate incidence by quintile of serum cholesterol. Multivariate analysis adjusted for race, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, body mass index and, in women, for age at menarche, parity, and menopausal status. No strong or consistent relation of low cholesterol to cancer incidence was found. Of the 21 cancers examined, only lymphoma in men and cervical cancer had significantly elevated risks at the lowest quintile of serum cholesterol compared with risks in the highest quintile. Cancer incidence in the first 2 years after the cholesterol measurement was consistently higher among persons whose cholesterol levels were in the lowest quintile. This prospective study did not find evidence that low cholesterol increased the risk of cancer but supports the idea that preclinical cancer in some way lowers serum cholesterol. PMID: 3793838 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] From: "Steve Harris" <sbharris123@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: sci.med,sci.med.diseases.cancer Subject: Re: Low Cholesterol-- Honest to God Colon CA Risk? Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 03:36:45 -0600 "Michael Sierchio" <kudzu@tenebras.com> wrote in message news:3B721F5B.985C5015@tenebras.com... > > Steve - > > we had a dialogue on this subject some years ago. At the time, > my understanding was that you considered low serum cholesterol > to be a symptom of a disease process -- non-cancerous disease > of the lung, cancer, leukemia, etc. -- rather than being a risk > factor for developing disease. Am I wrong? No. I did then, and it usually is. Disease causes chronic inflammation (TNF!), bad nutrition, and loss of weight-- and low cholesterol in the process. This includes most cancers. However, it's more complicated, and there may actually be a few diseases for which cholesterol is a genuine risk factor. Due to review of the literature I have since changed my mind for one quite specific cancer of the proximal colon in (usually obese men), and wanted to share that. There may be more. SBH From: "Steve Harris" <sbharris123@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition,sci.med Subject: Re: Dangers of low cholesterol Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:27:43 -0600 Here's a nice little review to remind us of what we're supposed to keep sight of. Am J Cardiol 1998 Nov 26;82(10B):14T-17T Why cholesterol as a central theme in coronary artery disease? Sacks FM. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Evidence from epidemiologic studies and clinical trials have conclusively demonstrated a direct association between coronary artery disease and levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Data from a number of studies suggest that even "average" or "normal" cholesterol levels are too high with respect to coronary artery disease risk. Low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have also emerged as a coronary artery disease risk. A recent meta-analysis has eliminated much of the controversy surrounding triglyceride's contribution to coronary artery disease risk, establishing triglyceride levels as an independent risk factor. Lowering lipid levels by any means-including pharmacologic, surgical, and dietary/lifestyle changes--decreases coronary artery disease risk. Publication Types: Review Review, tutorial PMID: 9860368 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Here's a meta analysis of the best dietary intervention studies, which should not be lumped in with the drug studies . It should be noted that these are mostly low saturated fat intervention studies, just like mamma told you. Not only do they show benefit, but those in which cholesterol decreases the most show the most benefit. Surprise. Aust N Z J Med 1994 Feb;24(1):98-106 Review of dietary intervention studies: effect on coronary events and on total mortality. Truswell AS. Department of Human Nutrition, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. The perfect randomised controlled dietary prevention trial of coronary heart disease has never been done. The best we can do is to look at all the trials together. Dietary trials should be separated from drug trials because they have different characteristics. Fourteen dietary trials which had disease or death as the end point are collected in this review for a meta-analysis. Three of the trials had two parts (male/female or low fat/increased fish), making a total of 17 trials. All were randomised trials, except the Finnish mental hospital trial which was a 12-year crossover in two hospitals. The trials were primary or secondary, diet only or multifactorial; numbers of subjects range from 52 to 57,460. For total deaths the ratio of intervention/control in all 17 trials is 0.94 (significantly less than 1.00) and for coronary events the pooled odds ratio is 0.87. But in the seven trials with most effective cholesterol lowering the odds ratios are 0.89 for all deaths and 0.70 for coronary events. There is thus no indication of excess all causes mortality in the dietary trials. Four recent secondary prevention trials had angiographic end points. There were a total of 275 subjects; trials were in Holland, USA, Germany and UK. In all trials plasma cholesterol was effectively lowered and coronary narrowing regressed a little, or progressed less in the diet group but significantly compared with controls. These angiographic trials strongly support the results of the major prevention trials. Lastly, a set of ten trials with fish oil after coronary angioplasty are reviewed. In some there appeared to be lower rates of restenosis, but not in all. The mechanism here is different from the major trials with plasma cholesterol-lowering diets for longer periods. Publication Types: Meta-analysis PMID: 8002875 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] From: "Steve Harris" <sbharris123@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition Subject: Re: cholesterol and mortality Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 01:43:20 -0600 "Marvin Nelson" <flaxforhealth@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3b74d1a1@news.polarcomm.com... > Steve, > > Does that mean that a subgroup of cholesterol patients "finally" get > their cholesterol low only to find shortly afterwards that they have > cancer. Do you as a doctor get concerned when a patient has > unexpectantly good results lowering their cholesterol, or if you see an > obese patient with low cholesterol? > > Just wondering, > Marv I do now! Haven't had anybody I can think of get colon cancer after being under treatment by me for years, so I don't think I've killed anybody with statins yet. In future I'm going to watch a little harder for this association. I do push colonoscopy and lots of my patients have had polyps removed-- it may be that prevention is fouling up any bad effects. Dunno. This is all quite new, and it's not even being formally recommended by the American Cancer Society yet. Somebody needs to do a reanalysis on a big group of people (Framingham) and see if they can *prospectively* find some colon cancers or polyps. |
|