From: Steve Harris <sbharris@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition Subject: Re: confounding variable is formaldehyde from methanol from aspartame, smoke, wines and liquors, pectins in fruits and vegetables: Murray 2005.06.02 Date: 2 Jun 2005 17:36:53 -0700 Message-ID: <1117759013.008962.291490@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> >>In humans, ingested or inhaled methanol is always quickly largely converted into formaldehyde and thence largely into formic acid. These are both potent cumulative toxins that must affect every cell type, thus aggravating every disease process. << COMMENT: Boloney, boloney, boloney. If this statement above was anywhere close to being true, then mortality among chronic formaldehyde workers would be vastly higher from every disease you can think of. They aren't. Studies have really not been able to find any bad effects in particular from the stuff. It's counterintuitive, but that's just too bad. I'm sure SOME level of formaldehyde is toxic. But it's FAR higher than the average person is exposed to, because people who ARE exposed to far higher amounts of formaldehyde than the average person is exposed to, seem to little worse for it. "The great tragedy of science - the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact." ---Thomas Huxley J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986 Jun;76(6):1071-84. Comment in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Oct 19;86(20):1556-8. Mortality among industrial workers exposed to formaldehyde. Blair A, Stewart P, O'Berg M, Gaffey W, Walrath J, Ward J, Bales R, Kaplan S, Cubit D. A historical cohort study evaluated the mortality experience of 26,561 workers employed in 10 formaldehyde-producing or -using facilities. Approximately 600,000 person-years of follow-up accrued as workers were followed to January 1, 1980. Estimates of historical exposure to formaldehyde by job were developed by project industrial hygienists using monitoring data available from participating plants, comments from long-term workers, and comprehensive monitoring data specifically collected for this study. Mortality from all causes combined was about as expected [standardized mortality ratio (SMR) = 96] based on mortality rates of the general U.S. population. Significantly fewer deaths occurred from infective and parasitic diseases (SMR = 51) and from accidents (SMR = 72) than expected. Cancer overall was not related to formaldehyde exposure. Workers exposed to formaldehyde had slight excesses for Hodgkin's disease and cancers of the lung and prostate gland, but these excesses were not consistently related to duration of or average, cumulative, or peak formaldehyde exposure levels. Recent animal studies found nasal cancer among rats exposed to formaldehyde, but no excess of this tumor occurred in this study. Mortality from brain cancer and leukemia among these industrial workers was not excessive in contrast to reported excesses among professional groups (e.g., anatomists, embalmers, and pathologists) with exposure to formaldehyde. Although there was a deficit for cancer of the buccal cavity and pharynx, mortality from certain subsites, i.e., the nasopharynx and oropharynx, was elevated. These subsites did not, however, show a consistently rising risk with level of exposure. These data provide little evidence that mortality from cancer is associated with formaldehyde exposure at levels experienced by workers in this study. PMID: 3458945 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] |