From: John De Armond Newsgroups: rec.outdoors.rv-travel Subject: Re: Engineers - The FINAL word (I hope :^)!) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:59:17 -0500 Mike Simmons wrote: > Jacques: > > You hit the nail on the head! That was exactly my point about the post.... > it is not the piece of paper, it is the individual and his abilities. > > I have no quarrel with the PE certification and I think some sort of > overview is necessary to ascertain whether a certain level of competence has > been achieved, ala the bar exam given to attorneys. Further, those who have > earned a degree or professional certification should be justifiably proud of > their achievement. What is important to realize is that the PE exists primarily and almost exclusively to give the state someone to blame when something goes wrong. In 1980 the utility I was consulting for was offering a significant bonus for getting or having a PE. I sat for and passed the EIT (Engineer in Training, the PE prelim), as did most of the people in my office. As a nuclear engineer, the EIT had just about nothing to do with what I was doing - it simply tested my ability to do math and to memorize the study guide. After a question of liability came up in our study group and one of my office-mates consulted an attorney for an opinion, everyone, myself included, who had not sat for the PE declined to do so. (The attorney's opinion was that a PE is professionally liable for anything he works on even if he does not stamp the work.) If I had gotten a PE it would have been in a discipline that had nothing to do with the work I was doing. The tranformation of the couple of guys in my office who got the PEs was remarkable and unfortunate. One the liability issue was clarified, they became extremely conservative to the point of paralysis. They were so risk-adverse that they really could not function in the positions they held. The credentials are important starting out but after a few years what matters is the track record. When I went to college, the microprocessor had not been invented, electronic calculators still cost $500, mastering a slide rule was a geek status symbol and the computer science geeks did their work on an old IBM 360 punch card system. Most everything I learned that applied to my work I learned AFTER I left school. We shouldn't forget that most of the richest and most successful men in the US lack degrees. Gates is at the top of the heap along with Larry Ellason. As an employer, I quickly learned that the best and most creative software programmers were the self-taught ones. After all, one does not need to sit in a classroom to absorb Knuth! John |