From: John De Armond Newsgroups: rec.outdoors.rv-travel Subject: Re: What would you sugest for an engine rebuild? Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:16:10 -0400 Message-ID: <09rgqusnt9gep6rmgsegn8me07t42lk8t8@4ax.com> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:41:32 -0700, "Stuart" <ourdad(nospam)@ptld.uswest.net> wrote: >here's the question: > with pulling a trailer the size I described, what would you suggest for a >rebuild? > >Bigger engine? >boring the one I have and going to bigger pistons? >an RV cam? >what about the heads? anything I can do there to improve the performance? > >I have an appointment to take the truck in to have it rebuilt in about 3 >weeks and figured I'd ask those who pull big RV's what they would recommend >for an engine rebuild. Especially since you're paying someone to do the repair instead of doing it yourself, my answer would be "none of the above". I'd find an engine and transfer case out of a low mileage late model wreck and transplant it in. You'll gain the benefit of modern manufacturing tolerances and techniques (tolerances that your average automotive machine shop can't even get close to). An engine that will go 200k miles or better is nice. You'll gain the power and economy benefits of EFI and electronic drivetrain management, assuming you get one with an electronic transmission. You'll get the MUCH superior serpentine belt system. And it'll probably cost less. You can either get the wiring harness and computer with the engine or just get the computer and go with an aftermarket harness like those from Painless Wiring. The latter keeps the ECM wiring completely separate from the vehicle wiring and so the job becomes a simple plug'n'play affair. This is the approach I now take on old vehicles. Example, I'm scouting around for a good low mileage Vortec engine and tranny for my 82 motorhome. I should be able to get an engine, tranny, computer and wiring harness for <$1500 and it'll drop right in. I'll get literally twice the power, better fuel economy, get rid of the V-belts that have to be replaced every season and will do it for less than the cost of a quality overhaul. John |